|
|
| Zbornici radova - Conference Proceedings |
|
QUALITY PROCEEDINGS
EDITORS:
Dr. Safet Brdarević, Dr. Sabahudin Jašarević
ISSN 1512-9268
| Quality 2019 |
14-16 June 2019 |
Neum, Bosnia and Herzegovina |
86 papers |
| Quality 2017 |
17-19 May 2017 |
Neum, Bosnia and Herzegovina |
79 papers |
| Quality 2015 |
10-12 June 2015 |
Neum, Bosnia and Herzegovina |
96 papers |
| Quality 2013 |
06-08 June 2013 |
Neum, Bosnia and Herzegovina |
102 papers |
| Quality 2011 |
01-04 June 2011 |
Neum, Bosnia and Herzegovina |
190 papers |
| Quality 2009 |
04-07 June 2009 |
Neum, Bosnia and Herzegovina |
163 papers |
| Quality 2007 |
06-09 June 2007 |
Neum, Bosnia and Herzegovina |
120 papers |
| Quality 2005 |
09-12 November 2005 |
Fojnica, Bosnia and Herzegovina |
87 papers |
| Quality 2003 |
13-14 November 2003 |
Zenica, Bosnia and Herzegovina |
86 papers |
| Quality 2001 |
08-09 November 2001 |
Zenica, Bosnia and Herzegovina |
58 papers |
| Quality 1999 |
11-12 November 1999 |
Zenica, Bosnia and Herzegovina |
48 papers |
|
NAPOMENA:
Stručno - naučni radovi objavljeni u Zbornicima radova objavljeni su u izvorniku. Recenzije radova proveli su članovi Naučnog odbora. Odgovornost za stručnu i jezičku ispravnost teksta preuzeli su autori radova.
|
DISCLAIMER:
Professional - scientific papers published in Conference proceedings are published in the original. Papers were reviewed by members of the Scientific Committee. Authors are responsible for technical and linguistic correctness of the text.
|
|
RECENZIRANJE:
Autor šalje rad e-mailom.
Urednik provjerava strukturu rada prema Uputama za autore kako bi se uvjerio da rad sadrži potrebne dijelove i stilizaciju.
Urednik šalje pozive članovima Naučnog odbora za koje smatra da bi bili prikladni recenzenti.
Potencijalni recenzenti se izjašnjavaju na osnovu vlastite stručnosti, sukoba interesa i dostupnosti.
Oni zatim prihvaćaju ili odbacuju da budu recenzenti. Ako je moguće, pri odbijanju, mogu predložiti alternativne recenzente.
Recenzent čita rad, kako bi napisao detaljnu recenziju prema obrascu za recenziranje. Recenzija se zatim šalje uredniku, uz preporuku da se rad prihvati sa ili bez izmjena ili da se odbije.
Urednik šalje e-mail o odlukama autoru, uključujući sve relevantne komentare recenzenata (anonimizrane).
Ako je prihvaćen, rad se priprema za objavljivanje. Ako je članak odbijen ili je vraćen na veće ili manje izmjene, urednik treba uključiti konstruktivne komentare recenzenata kako bi pomogao autoru poboljšati rad. U ovom trenutku, i recenzenti se obavještavaju putem e-maila, uz obavijest o ishodu njihove recenzije. Ako je papir vraćen na izmjene, recenzenti bi trebali očekivati da će primiti novu verziju, osim ako nisu odbili daljnje recenziranje. Kada su predložene samo male izmjene, konačni pregled će izvršiti urednik.
|
THE PEER REVIEW PROCESS:
The author submits the paper by email.
The editor checks the paper’s structure against the Author Guidelines to make sure it includes the required sections and stylizations.
The editor sends invitations to members of the Scientific Committee he believes would be appropriate reviewers.
Potential reviewers consider the invitation against their own expertise, conflicts of interest and availability. They then accept or decline. If possible, when declining, they might also suggest alternative reviewers.
The reviewer reads the paper, in order to write a detailed review according to the review form. The review is then submitted to the editor, with a recommendation to accept it with or without modifications, or to reject it.
The editor sends a decision email to the author including any relevant reviewer comments (anonymized).
If accepted, the paper is prepared for publishing. If the article is rejected or sent back for either major or minor revision, the editor should include constructive comments from the reviewers to help the author improve the article. At this point, reviewers are also informed by email letting them know the outcome of their review. If the paper was sent back for revision, the reviewers should expect to receive a new version, unless they have opted out of further participation. However, where only minor changes were requested this follow-up review might be done by the editor.
|
|
OTVORENI PRISTUP:
Ovaj zbornik je publikacija s otvorenim pristupom što znači da je sav sadržaj dostupan besplatno, bez naknade za korisnika ili njegovu/ njenu instituciju. Korisnici mogu čitati, preuzimati, kopirati, distribuirati, štampati, pretraživati, ili postavljati linkove na tekstove članaka u ovom zborniku ne tražeći prethodno odobrenje izdavača ili autora. To je u skladu s definicijom BOAI otvorenog pristupa. |
OPEN ACCESS:
This is an open access publication which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access. |
|
|
|
